without.

without

Laura Bloomsbury on 7. June 2016 at 17:15 said:

ultimately I’d choose with

Reply ↓
- stadtauge on 7. June 2016 at 17:17 said:
  
  thank you laura! sunny greetings from Berlin
  Daniel
  
  Reply ↓
Cate Franklyn on 7. June 2016 at 17:59 said:

with.

Reply ↓
Jan K. alias Afanja on 7. June 2016 at 22:21 said:

Absolutely with!

Reply ↓
- stadtauge on 7. June 2016 at 23:26 said:
  
  Thank you!
  
  Reply ↓
paula graham on 7. June 2016 at 22:35 said:

For me the ‘With’ has more immediate impact however on further examination, for the the Without is more stylish and its impact more subtle.

Reply ↓
koriandermadame on 7. June 2016 at 22:40 said:

Beide!

Reply ↓
koriandermadame on 7. June 2016 at 22:41 said:

müsste ich wählen, dann ohne … ist ehrlicher Berlin 🙂

Reply ↓
- stadtauge on 7. June 2016 at 23:25 said:
  
  endlich mal ohne. begründung jefälltma.
  
  Reply ↓
Yvonne on 8. June 2016 at 6:27 said:

Another vote for ‘with’.

Reply ↓

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

STADTAUGE